Indiana has become the first state in the US this year to take substantial legislative action against "sweepstakes casinos". The state's House of Representatives passed the HB 1052 ban bill proposed by Representative Ethan Manning this week with an overwhelming majority of 87 votes in favor and 11 against. The bill aims to prohibit this type of operation that combines online competitions with casino-style gaming and has been sent to the Senate for further consideration. These businesses typically use a multi-currency system, allowing users to play games with virtual coins before exchanging them for cash rewards, operating in a legal gray area. The bill stipulates that violators can be fined up to $100,000 in civil penalties. Interestingly, although Manning, the initiator of the bill, is a strong advocate for the legalization of online casinos (iCasino) in Indiana, he indicated that the passage of iCasino is unlikely this year.
Core of the Bill: Definitions, Fines, and Regulatory Challenges
HB 1052's core is to explicitly prohibit "sweepstakes casinos" from operating in Indiana. The bill defines them as online competitions using a multi-currency system, allowing users to convert online currency into cash rewards after playing casino-style games. This indicates the legislators' intent to close loopholes that circumvent traditional gambling law regulation using virtual currencies and competition formats.
Notably, several adjustments during the legislative process reflect the complexity of reality:
• Terminology change: During committee deliberations, the term "dual currency" was changed to "multi-currency" to cover a broader range of operations.
• Nature of penalties: The penalties were downgraded from criminal to civil penalties.
• Regulatory challenges: Indiana's Gaming Commission's chief legal advisor once candidly stated that existing laws make it difficult to determine violations by sweepstakes casinos, hence the need for clear legislative authority to issue prohibitions.
National Regulatory Wave: Multi-State Actions and Controversies
Indiana's action is not an isolated case but part of a regulatory wave sweeping across several states in the US. Last year, six states (including California, New Jersey, New York, etc.) passed similar bans. Louisiana's legislature also passed a ban, but it was vetoed by the governor, citing that existing laws already empower regulatory authorities to enforce the law, after which the state's Gaming Control Board issued prohibitions to over 40 unlicensed operators.
This year, the wave continues, with related proposals already introduced in several states:
•Maryland, Mississippi: Last year's ban proposals passed one chamber but ultimately failed, making a comeback this year.
•Florida, Maine, Tennessee, Virginia: Legislators have also introduced related bills this year.
Industry insiders note that this issue unites legislators of different stances because they generally believe it represents "illegal gambling and loss of state revenue". Louisiana's legislators even sought to link the operation of sweepstakes casinos with potential extortion charges, showing their determination to combat.
Walking the Gray Area: Definition Disputes and Future Regulation
The core controversy of sweepstakes casinos lies in their legal characterization. They often argue that they offer "free" games, with rewards coming from "draws" rather than betting, thereby evading gambling law regulation. This model attracts a large number of users and also raises concerns about fairness, consumer protection, and tax revenue loss. State regulatory agencies commonly face challenges due to insufficient legal basis, which is precisely why there is a push for specific legislation to prohibit. The shift from criminal penalties to civil fines also reflects legislators' balance between strict enforcement and practical operability. As more states take action, this business model operating in the gray area will face increasingly tight living space, and its legal definition and regulatory boundaries will be continuously clarified through a series of legislative and judicial cases. For the latest trends and complex cases in US state gambling regulation, visit the PASA official website for in-depth analysis.
————
This article is from "PASA-Global iGaming Leaders," a gambling industry news channel:https://t.me/pasa_news
Original in-depth gambling channel:https://t.me/gamblingdeep
Free data reports: @pasa_research
PASA Matrix: @pasa002_bot
PASA official website: https://www.pasa.news
