Thailand's push to establish a casino entertainment complex recently caused a stir in parliament. On July 3, Senator and Special Committee Chairman Weerapan held a press conference, directly pointing out that the bill's process was hasty and lacked transparency, questioning the government's push for the legalization of casinos without sufficient research and public consultation, potentially evading public supervision.
Weerapan listed up to 12 key doubts at the meeting, requesting the Prime Minister or his representative to personally explain the background and details of the bill on July 17. He emphasized: "This case was not authorized by voters, nor was it included in any political party's platform, yet it was suddenly pushed forward, raising questions about its motives." He called for a halt to the legislative process, advocating for a comprehensive re-evaluation, and did not exclude submitting it to the Constitutional Court for review if the government insists on proceeding.
These 12 disputes cover multiple core issues, including: whether it is reasonable that the casino area only accounts for 10% but is claimed to contribute 90% of the revenue? Whether the government has already privately approved the location of 5 casinos? Whether the related land acquisition is legal and compliant? Whether the income forecast for Thai players deviates from reality? And whether there are structural loopholes in the regulatory system?
Weerapan pointed out that such far-reaching policies must be debated publicly and involve citizen participation, not behind-the-scenes operations. He stated: "Better to be slow than to go blindly."
In addition to Weerapan, several senators also strongly opposed. Senator Phi Sath believes that the bill appears to violate several constitutional articles, especially in the absence of public opinion, potentially exacerbating gambling addiction problems, affecting youth and social atmosphere. He bluntly stated: "Legalizing underground casinos is just a change of slogan for taxation, and it does not solve social problems."
In terms of public opinion, multiple polls have shown that the public is cautious about the legalization of casinos, with the majority being reserved or opposed, and the ruling team's lack of communication during the process of advancing the bill has led to political tension and distrust.
Currently, the Senate's stance is becoming tougher, clearly stating that if the government does not withdraw the draft, they will collectively exert pressure, and do not exclude seeking the intervention of the Constitutional Court.
Whether Thailand's "casino blueprint" is a way out to revitalize the economy or a hidden danger of social unrest remains a controversy that has not yet concluded, with the storm still brewing.
